lohabuy.blogg.se

1. #OSX LEOPARD VISTA BOOT CAMP SUPPORT DRIVERS MAC OS X#
2. #OSX LEOPARD VISTA BOOT CAMP SUPPORT DRIVERS MAC OS#

#OSX LEOPARD VISTA BOOT CAMP SUPPORT DRIVERS MAC OS#

Vista is slower than XP on the same hardware, but so was OSX 10.0 slower than Mac OS 9 on the same hardware.īTW, for many, Tiger is *slower* than Panther. 1 release, but who’s to say that Vista won’t get faster over time? It’s already gotten faster even over the past year, without any. And even if that’s down to “bad coding”, Tiger is still faster than Vista.”

#OSX LEOPARD VISTA BOOT CAMP SUPPORT DRIVERS MAC OS X#

“Oh, and Mac OS X updates get faster each release, not slower in every single aspect. People want polished things today, not tomorrow, not six years from now. Raymond’s suggestions in The Cathedral and the Bazaar than the MicroSoft thrice a decade model. Oddly enough, Apple’s stance on delivering yearly updates to the software is more in line with Eric S. People are taking notice, look no further than the recent reports on sales figures for proof. I’d rather pay smaller chunks of money for incremental updates to functions and features TODAY than pay buttloads of money for stuff I don’t need that gets delivered FIVE YEARS LATE.Īpple is consistently delivering valuable additions to their Operating System and Platform. Personally, I much prefer the Apple model. are all my imagination?Īre the changes as visible? No. So I suppose the vast addition of device support with driver updates, bluetooth improvements in the 10.3.x releases, etc. Of course, that’s Microsoft’s own bloody fault. Leopard has “300 new features”? By Apple’s count, Vista’d have 300 000. It’s Microsoft’s sloppy default setup that is to blame, not NT’s security itself.Įasy on the exclamation marks, by the way.Īnd if i follow your thinking, microsoft should have proposed Vista for free, right? How do you explain that it costs a fortune, but still it is bloody full of major bugs.īecause Windows Vista is a much bigger release than any of the OS X. There is nothing wrong with NT’s security. And no, it did not fix a flawed design for security. Yeah and it introduced a set of new features. Service Packs for Windows, well, sometimes they add new features, sometimes they don’t.ĭon’t tell me that XP SP2 was more than that, SP2 was intended to fix an insecure system and a flawed design for security, so its a bug fix release!!!! They do NOT add new features to the operating system. Microsoft Service packs are nothing more than bugs fixes and some features improvements, which is exactly what Apple does with their 10.x.x releases.Įrm, 10.x.x releases are bugfix and security releases.